1 The single neuron
- Borrowed idea from biology: weighted inputs → threshold → output (we model the idea, not the biology).
- A neuron does two steps:
1. Weighted sum: z = w1·x1 + w2·x2 + b 2. Activation: ŷ = f(z) (f is a non-linear function) Full form: ŷ = f(w1·x1 + w2·x2 + b) = f(wᵀx + b)
- Weights (w) scale each input; bias (b) shifts the result.
2 Neuron = logistic regression
- A single neuron with sigmoid activation is exactly logistic regression:
ŷ = σ(wᵀx + b). - Both: weighted sum of features → sigmoid squashes to (0,1) → binary classification.
- Takeaway: you already know neural networks — a neuron is the atom they're built from.
3 Decision boundary & bias
- A 2-input neuron draws one straight line in 2D:
w1·x1 + w2·x2 + b = 0(a hyperplane in nD). - Change weights → line rotates; change bias → line shifts.
- Without a bias the boundary must pass through the origin — bias is the intercept that lets it move to the right spot.
- Limitation: a single neuron can only make a linear boundary → cannot separate data that isn't linearly separable.
4 Why activation functions
- Stack two linear layers and substitute:
h = W1·x + b1
y = W2·h + b2 = (W2·W1)·x + (W2·b1 + b2)
= W'·x + b' ← still ONE linear layer
- Linear × linear = linear. No matter how many layers you stack, with no activation it collapses to a single linear map.
- Activations add the non-linear "bend" that makes depth meaningful (analogy: stacking flat glass never makes a lens — you need a curve).
5 Activation functions
Sigmoid: σ(z) = 1 / (1 + e⁻ᶻ) Tanh: tanh(z) = (eᶻ − e⁻ᶻ)/(eᶻ + e⁻ᶻ), tanh(z) = 2σ(2z) − 1 ReLU: max(0, z) LeakyReLU:max(αz, z), small α (e.g. 0.01)
- Sigmoid: output (0,1), interpretable as probability, smooth. Cons: vanishing gradient for large |z|, not zero-centered, slow in hidden layers → use at output for binary.
- Tanh: output (−1,1), zero-centered, stronger gradients near 0. Still vanishes at extremes; common in RNNs.
- ReLU: cheap (just a comparison), no vanishing gradient for z>0, sparse activation. Cons: dead neuron problem (if z<0 always, gradient stays 0). Default for hidden layers.
- LeakyReLU / ELU: small slope for z<0 → fix dead neurons.
| Sigmoid | Tanh | ReLU | LeakyReLU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range | (0,1) | (−1,1) | [0,∞) | (−∞,∞) |
| Zero-centered? | No | Yes | No | No |
| Gradient issue | Vanishing | Vanishing | Dead neurons | None |
| When to use | Binary output | RNNs | Hidden layers | Hidden layers |
6 From neuron to layer to MLP
- A layer = many neurons in parallel; each has its own weights and draws its own boundary → many boundaries at once.
- Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP): Input → Hidden layer(s) → Output, fully connected (every neuron connects to every neuron in the next layer).
- What depth buys you: 1 layer = straight lines, 2 layers = convex shapes, 3+ layers = arbitrary shapes. More layers → more complex boundaries → more powerful models.
7 Forward pass
- The forward pass = data flowing input → output, one layer at a time:
For each layer: z = W·x + b → a = f(z) → feed a to next layer
- In words: multiply by weights, add bias, apply activation, repeat until the output layer.
8 The XOR problem
- XOR is not linearly separable → a single neuron (one line) cannot solve it.
- Fix: add one hidden layer with 2 neurons (a 2-2-1 MLP). Each hidden neuron learns one line; the output neuron combines them (AND/OR-like) to give correct XOR.
- This is the core reason "deep" learning is deep — depth solves problems a flat model can't.
- History: Minsky & Papert (1969) proved the perceptron can't do XOR. The field concluded neural nets were a dead end; the fix (hidden layers + backprop) wasn't developed until 1986 — a ~17-year gap.
9 MLP architecture choices
- How many hidden layers? Start with 1–2; add more only if underfitting.
- Neurons per layer? Common: 32, 64, 128, 256 (powers of 2 for GPU efficiency).
- Which activation? ReLU hidden; sigmoid (binary) / softmax (multi-class) output.
- Magic formula? No — architecture design is empirical: try, evaluate, adjust.
★ Likely exam questions
Q1. What does the bias term do in a neuron?
It shifts the decision boundary. Without bias the boundary must pass through the origin; bias acts like the intercept, letting the line move to the correct position.
Q2. What kind of decision boundary can a single neuron draw?
A linear one — a straight line in 2D, a hyperplane in nD. It cannot curve or bend, so it fails on non-linearly-separable data.
Q3. What happens if you stack many linear layers with no activation between them?
It collapses to a single linear layer: W_n···W_1 = W'. Depth without non-linearity gives no extra power.
Q4. Why is ReLU preferred over sigmoid in hidden layers?
No vanishing gradient (gradient = 1 for z>0), computationally cheap (a comparison), and faster convergence. Sigmoid gradients shrink toward 0 for large |z|, slowing deep nets.
Q5. Why can't a single neuron solve XOR, and how does an MLP fix it?
XOR isn't linearly separable, so one line can't separate the classes. A 2-2-1 MLP: each hidden neuron learns a line, output neuron combines them (AND/OR-like) for correct XOR.
Q6. How is a single neuron related to logistic regression?
They're identical: a neuron with sigmoid activation, ŷ = σ(wᵀx + b), is logistic regression — weighted sum + sigmoid + binary output.
Q7. Describe the forward pass in one line.
For each layer: multiply by weights, add bias, apply activation (z = Wx + b, a = f(z)), feeding the output forward until the final layer.